FEATURES
This part two of Nick
Clegg's speech on taxation. Click
here to read part one.
Liberal Democrat Tax
Plans
We already have a radical tax package, cutting
the basic rate of income tax to just 16p, to make work really pay for everyone.
And scrapping the unfair council tax, which hurts the poorest the
most.
Council Tax bills have more than doubled since Labour came to
power, and the poorest pensioners pay four times as high a percentage of their
income than the richest working people.
Removing this unfair tax
and replacing it with a fair local income tax will massively shift the tax
burden away from the poor - and take many people on the lowest incomes out of
tax altogether - those who don't pay income tax but are hit by the council tax.
It's absolutely vital that we make these tax changes if we want to
make work pay.
At the moment, for every pound you earn over and
above six thousand, at least 31p is lost in tax and National Insurance.
But for many, because of the loss of tax credits and means tested
benefits like Council Tax benefit, much more is lost. 1.8 million people face an
effective tax rate of more than 60%.
For the worst affected, the
tax rate can be 90p in every pound. And almost all of them are low
earners.
The moment you add in the cost of childcare - or travel to
work - for far too many people work is just not a viable option. And that
impacts on the economy.
Families who are dependent on benefits and
discouraged from working don't have the incomes for the consumer spending the
economy needs.
So these tax cuts are at the heart of the Liberal
Democrat plans. And we will make up the money by taxing pollution and reforming
capital gains tax and pensions tax relief.
Switching over £8bn of
taxation from income to pollution is and will continue to be one of the corner
stones of Liberal Democrat tax policy.
The other two parties'
environmental credentials will not stand up to closer inspection unless they are
prepared to use green taxes to change behaviour.
On
pensions, we believe everyone should be entitled to basic rate relief on their
pension contributions - but higher earners shouldn't get extra money by getting
higher rate tax relief.
And when it comes to Capital Gains Tax, I
look to that great socialist reformer... Nigel Lawson.
Following
Lawson's model for CGT, we will index-link capital gains and then tax them as
income.
No more will hedge fund managers be able to present their
income as capital to secure themselves an 18% tax rate, while their cleaners pay
31%.
Finally, we will dramatically simplify business tax. The
Government's constant tinkering fails to meet the basic needs of business:
stability.
So I want to abolish complex reliefs like R&D tax
credits and instead simply cut the headline rate of corporation tax.
Liberal Democrats Going Forward
This
is already by far the most radical tax package on offer in British politics.
It's fully costed to be revenue neutral.
But I want to go much,
much further, so we can lift even more of the tax burden from low and middle
income families.
It is likely that the next election will be fought
with the UK economy in its weakest state since the Conservative recession of the
1990s.
Ordinary families in good jobs and on a decent salary are
struggling with rocketing food and energy bills and ever higher debt
repayments.
So the Liberal Democrats will show that we can spend
and tax more intelligently in order to cut taxes for low and middle income
families who are feeling the pinch. And take the poorest out of tax
altogether.
I am setting in motion today a process that will
deliver more financial flexibility in government, so that money can be given
back to ordinary families. As the economy worsens, now is when they need it
most.
There are two strands to this process. First, how we can cut
tax avoidance, so everyone pays their fair dues. All the extra revenue should be
ploughed into reducing rates overall.
And second, how we can
streamline government expenditure to free up resources.
Our aim is
simple. If there is money to spare once we have funded our public policy
priorities, we will not look for more things to spend it on. We will look for
new ways to hand it back - to the poorest families
first.
Raising The Money - Tax
Avoidance
It is time to get tough on tax avoidance
both by businesses and individuals. It is unacceptable that someone on the
minimum wage can pay 31% tax when some of the very richest people and businesses
can pay virtually no tax at all.
We must stop the drive from
companies who decide to locate "virtually" offshore.
The UK has
much to offer, good communications, a skilled worked force and a desirable place
to live. If a company is attracted by these things it must also pay UK tax.
A Liberal Democrat Government would have a very simple rule. If
your company is based in the UK, you pay tax in the UK - not Jersey or the
Cayman Islands.
In particular we want to make sure property taxes
are paid in full. Buildings and land are, quite clearly, located in the UK or
they're not. You can't "offshore" a building - so we shouldn't let them go
offshore for tax purposes.
Too many top companies and prosperous
people in Britain now see no shame in aggressive tax avoidance. It may, strictly
speaking, be legal but it lets down millions of hardworking ordinary
taxpayers.
So over the coming months, we will work with financial
experts and business to find ways to make tax avoidance so difficult it is no
longer worth trying.
I want to send a clear message to businesses
and some very wealthy people that tax is not optional.
But I
pledge that all of the money we identify that we can recoup from tax avoidance
will be used to cut taxes for low and middle income earners - not ploughed into
extra spending.
Raising The Money -
Spending
There is always a temptation for governments
to spend more and more. The hubris of government deludes ministers into thinking
they can solve every problem with a new grant, or an extra spending
commitment.
This is a fantasy. There is a lot the Government can do
to improve people's lives.
But it must never underestimate the
importance of leaving people's money in their pockets as a tool of real, daily
empowerment.
So the Liberal Democrats will question every single
penny of government spending.
David Cameron yesterday distanced
himself from the James Review which the Tories produced at the last election on
the basis it wasn't credible.
He's right it wasn't, but not for the
reasons he said. David Cameron now seems to believe that an opposition need not
produce any detail on how it plans to change public spending.
The
James review had the right intention, to identify areas where the Conservatives
would cut public spending, it was only incredible because the research was dodgy
and the numbers it produced were worse.
Making detailed decisions
of what you would and wouldn't spend public money on is exactly what a true
opposition party should be doing - offering a real alternative to the
Government.
This is a process we have already started. Our
Treasury team of Vince Cable and Jeremy Browne are closely looking at everything
the Government spends your money on.
This process has already shown
that there are times when public money simply shouldn't be spent at all - like
on the unnecessary and extravagant ID card scheme.
And that public
money can be spent much better if, for example, we radically decentralise the
NHS, or scale back Tax Credits.
We are totally committed to
decentralisation - not just of services but of taxes too.
Once
central government does less, it can tax less.
Until Labour or the
Conservatives make this basic financial commitment to decentralisation, it's
clear their proposals are just talk.
Communities will not have real
power over local services until they have the power to raise and spend their own
money.
These are no easy choices and not every penny of Government
spending is either good or bad - but it is this lack of rigour and lack of
scrutiny which has seen Government spending shoot up over the last
decade.
We must get away from the Labour notion that if the
Government is spending more it must be doing better.
We have set a
target to reallocate £20 billion of Government spending to Liberal Democrat
priorities - taking money away from unnecessary or wasteful policies and
redirecting them towards our key priorities.
And we will look for
ways we can replace some benefits with tax cuts, to reduce bureaucracy and
dependency.
I just don't believe it's right that a low-income
family should pay, say, £3000 in tax and get £2500 back in tax credits, when
they ought to just be paying less tax, or no tax at all.
I don't
believe it's right that 90% of families are eligible for means tested
benefits.
The Government believes that's part of the stakeholder
society - so everyone pays in and everyone gets out.
But we, as
liberals, believe it is better to enable people to stand on their own than to
drag them into state dependency.
At every opportunity this
Government has tried to creep into people's lives. The benefit system has too
often been used as another way of doing it.
Reforming the benefit
system is not easy, and we will always ensure that vulnerable people do not end
up losers. But we must end this merry-go-round where the Government gives with
one hand and takes with
another.
Conclusion
Many of
the things I have laid out here today are not easy. We have already taken tough
choices and we must take more.
It is only tough choices that will
enable us to reduce the tax burden on those who are overtaxed, and limit the tax
burden on Britain as a whole.
But I ardently believe we must act -
cutting taxes first and foremost for lower earners, so every family can make
ends meet, and make a good life for themselves.
We must never
forget that public money is just that: public. It is not the government's
by right. It is given in trust, and spent for and on behalf of the people.
Ministers should be as careful with it as if they had borrowed
money from a friend.
And that is why a Liberal Democrat Government
would ensure that we never spend or tax a penny more than is
needed.




















